Brian Greene was on The Big Bang Theory last night. Sheldon was at one of his book signings and asked him why he chose to do something useless with his life, like communicating complex scientific principles and findings so the general public could understand them, rather than something useful like reading to the elderly. While realizing that this was asked in jest (although Sheldon was serious), it is similar to something I often think about when posting on this blog.
Often I have ideas that are completely novel to me, only to find that someone more articulate than myself has presented them somewhere else. For example, the other day I mulled over the idea that the presidential election would be better if it was done similar to a reality television show. The GOP will likely have two candidates in the primaries that are reality television stars (Trump and Palin), so why not put the candidates through the rigorous testing that reality television provides. It can’t be worse than what we currently do.
And then I was reading through Marginal Revolution posts and found this post from Cowen. Genius.
This is one example of how I doubt there is something new I can provide to the blogosphere. However, I also realize that if I wrote that post, my insight would have been slightly different than Cowen’s.
If n monkeys typing at random could write the entire works of Shakespeare within time t, what about the monkeys that type one letter different, or one word different, or one phrase. Is it possible that they could improve Shakespeare?
Anyways, for those of you that enjoy The Big Bang Theory, you should also check out The Big Blog Theory. One of the consultants for the show comments on the science involved in that week’s episode.